Week 2 Assessment: Annotated List of OER

Welcome to my second course the Diploma in Open Education Program: Open Education Resources and Pedagogies, and to the first assessment in this course: creating an annotated list of OER for a project or goal.

For your annotated OER list, you are expected to include the following: 

  • A description of your aspirations for a future project or what goals you might target
  • The sources, including, title, author(s), cc license, and link to each within your list
  • In your annotations, explain how each source might be used in your context
  • Illustrate the social justice, racial equity or cultural relevance aspects of your project

My immediate future goal at work is to further Open Education at my college through engaging with students, faculty, staff, and administrators around the affordability, sustainability, flexibility, collaboration, that adopting/adapting/creating OER bring to an institution.  To that end, I am looking for OER that support engagement, training, and advocacy to help me work with my Director to develop a plan.  And there are a LOT of things out there to get started with.  So, here are some OER I have found I am hoping to integrate into my own advocacy over the next year.  Note that not all of these OER address issues of social justice, racial equity or cultural relevance directly, but I would argue that advocacy for Open Education includes these as part of its very definition.

Okanagan College’s Open Education Strategy and Open Education Plan, June 2021, CC-BY

I just found this last week, and man I was SO excited to see this.  This document was produced in 2021 with support from BCcampus funding, and it is exactly what I had been looking for to adapt for my own college.  Prepared by Roen Janyk, a librarian at Okanagan College, “the main goals of Okanagan College’s Open Education Strategy and Action Plan are to integrate Open Education Practices and Open Education Resources into curriculum and curriculum development processes, to equalize access to education and course materials, and to support learners and educators in accessing, creating, and utilizing open resources.”  The document defines Open Education, links Open Education to Okanagan’s strategic plan, places Okanagan’s action plan in the context of BC post-secondary institutions, identifies strategies and success measures, and provides concrete examples of the importance of Open Education from research, including it’s potential impact on social justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization, etc. Most importantly for me, are concrete tips for advocacy for Open Education to administrators, faculty, and students.

OER Policy Development Tool. 2016, CC-BY. Amanda Coolidge, Senior Manager Open Education, BCcampus and Institute for Open Leadership Fellow, and Daniel DeMarte, Chief Academic Officer, Tidewater Community College and Institute for Open Leadership Fellow.

I would be remiss if I did not include some OER from the folks at BCcampus.   This first one is a bit beyond what I can do at my institution, but it does contain some good information around how to advocate for Open Education and a good starting point for anyone who has the authority to begin adding Open Education to policy at an institution.  As the document begins “few colleges and universities in the United States have formal policies in place that institutionalize the promise of OER. To this day, there remains insufficient support for OER from officials who have formal responsibility for overseeing most colleges and universities in the United States. The purpose of this OER policy tool is to help close this gap. The tool has been created specifically for college and university governance officials, as well as individuals who have responsibility for developing institutional policy, to promote the utilization of OER and scale efforts to full OER programs.  The contents of the OER policy tool are intended to be adopted and adapted for use within a college or university’s culture.”  Yes, the US is identified as the main audience for this document, but given that Canadian post-secondary institutions are lagging behind the US in terms of Open Education advocacy and integration into policy, I feel this document could easily be adapted for a Canadian context.  Finally, the importance of having Open Education embedded in institutional policy cannot be over stated, since integrating Open Education in curriculum addresses issues of equity, accessibility, diversity of voices in our education system.

Second from BCcampus is the OER Student Toolkit.  2016, CC-BY.  This is “a BCcampus Open Education advocacy guide for student leaders” by Authors: Daniel Munro; Jenna Omassi; and Brady Yano.  According to the introduction, “this toolkit provides information on how interested student societies/associations as well as individual students can successfully advocate for greater OER adoption on campus. Primarily designed to serve post-secondary students in Canada working to support open education, we hope this toolkit will be useful to students from any country.”  This OER in particular situates OER advocacy with those who typically have the least power at a post-secondary institution, students.

Book Description: 

The OER Starter Kit for Program Managers, 2022, CC-BY, is a multi-author work authored and compiled by Abbey K. Elder; Stefanie Buck; Jeff Gallant; Marco Seiferle-Valencia; and Apurva Ashok. “The OER Starter Kit for Program Managers was created to bring attention to the work that is involved in building and managing an OER program, from learning about open educational practices and soliciting team members to collecting and reporting data on your program’s outcomes. Regardless of your program’s scope and your own experience with OER, we hope that the Starter Kit for Program Managers will have some tips to help you along your way.”  With chapters, and more importantly case studies, related to building an OER program, training, project management, supporting OER creation and adoption, and collecting and reporting data, this book is a wealth of information to support those like me who are doing Open Education work off the sides of their desks.  This book was written by a diverse group with the intention that the advice provided could be applicable to Open Education advocates around the world.

Report and Recommendations for Open Educational Resources (OER) Initiatives and Affordable Alternatives at uOttawa, 2021, CC-BY.  “Created in late 2019, the OALM Working Group had the mandate to 1) develop awareness and promote the use of affordable course content; 2) explore and recommend strategies to establish an environment at uOttawa in which the creation and adoption of OER is encouraged and rewarded; and 3) coordinate efforts among key campus stakeholders who lead and support open education initiatives on campus. Its report concludes twelve months of work and builds on existing open access and e-learning initiatives. It presents four categories of recommendations to guide open education and textbook affordability activities at uOttawa for the next five years.”  Similarly to the Okanagan College strategy plan, The uOttawa report advocates for raising awareness of Open Education, supporting the use and creation of OER (and in this case, specifically of French language OER) and encouraging the use of other affordable or cost-free course materials, all with concrete recommendations for reaching these goals.

One of my favourite Open Education initiatives is the WY Open:  A Grassroots Open Educational Resources Initiative, 2021, CC-BY-SA, by Shannon Smith, Chad Hutchens, and Cassandra Kvenild at Boise State University and the University of Wyoming.  The initiative is presented as a recipe in an easy to read PDF which includes nutrition information, number served, cooking time, ingredients, preparation, cooking method, etc. to fulfill the metaphor.  “This recipe describes starting a library-led open educational resources (OER) as a mechanism to recognize and promote cost-savings for students while allowing faculty to tailor their learning materials to specific pedagogy needs. The grassroots approach is best implemented alongside existing organizational infrastructures. At the University of Wyoming (UW), the OER initiative developed without a dedicated position or home department but rather a collaborative foundation across the libraries which builds momentum, spreads the message, and ultimately the workload.”  My favourite part is the allergy warning which speaks to the potentially contentious conversations around Open versus freely available, as well as issues of copyright (to which I would add ownership and intellectual property concerns faculty often have.)

There are many other OER out there which are intended to support creating OER initiatives, and advocating for Open Education at an institutional level – these are just the beginning.  I am looking forward to taking a much closer look at all of these to come up with a clearer path to recommend at my institution.

Posted in Open, open education | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Open Education News and Stuff – Post 5

As I slowly catch up on posting my Open Ed News and Stuff emails, I now am hitting August, after I returned from a not very restful vacation.  From August 22, here we go!

Good morning everyone, and welcome back (for those of you who are back…)

It’s hard to believe that classes start in 2 weeks.  I hope all of you have found time to enjoy at least some of the summer.  I have been reflecting for myself that asking people if they have had a “good summer” may not be a good question for those who have not.  I only hope you found some time to rest and refresh in some way.

And now, on to some Open Education news and stuff.

First, an announcement that happened towards the end of June:  SFU Senate decision marks new commitment to open education – VP Academic – Simon Fraser University  With more and more BC institutions (and institutions across Canada) making Open Education an institutional priority, hopefully Camosun will follow suit sometime soon!

Second, an announcement from BCcampus about their new B.C. Open Collection.   I encourage you to check it out and consider adding your own open resources:

“As of June 2022, the new B.C. Open Collection site has officially launched.  The B.C. Open Collection can be found at collection.bccampus.ca, which is a site that initially held open course packs first released by BCcampus in 2020. This site now contains both these open course packs and the contents of the B.C. Open Textbook Collection hosted at open.bccampus.ca.  The old collection on the open.bccampus.ca site will remain online for the time being but will eventually be retired at an undetermined date. A notice to users has been placed on open.bccampus.ca redirecting them to collection.bccampus.ca.  To learn more about the functionality of our new collection site, read the blog post Creating a Better User Experience for the B.C. Open Collection.”

And finally, a couple of resources that might be of interest to you:

From the Canada OER (CanadaOER) listserv: A list of suggested OER for courses at UOttawa : https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/uottawaoerdisciplineversion2/

Perhaps of interest to our librarians particularly:  From the CCCOER (Community College Consortium for OER) “Excited to share the announcement of a new publication from ACRL – “Intersections of Open Educational Resources and Information Literacy” edited by Mary Ann Cullen and Elizabeth Dill.”

If there is anything related to Open Education or OER you would like to share with out Open Group, let me know!  And also, I will be visiting Departments and Program groups this fall to talk about Open Education.  If you would like me to visit your group, just send me a note!

Thanks, and welcome to (almost) Fall 2022.

Emily

 

Posted in Open, open education | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Open Education News and Stuff – Post 4

Forward now to the final Open Ed news email before the summer hit:  June 13th. Now, the links here are specific to Camosun College, but there are likely similar units where you can look for help at your own institutions – libraries, teaching and learning centres, copyright offices, etc.  So hopefully this will give you some idea of who to contact if you are looking for help and ideas.  So, here we go:

Hi everyone!

This will be the last Open Education email until August.  Everyone is slipping away for a well-deserved break (at least I hope most of you are) and I will be gone in July as well.  So, with that, I wanted to send a short email with some reminders of where to get help with Open Education at Camosun (questions, ideas, projects…you name it!)

First and foremost, if you are looking for Open Educational Resources (either in the strict sense of being Creative Commons licences or resources that are free for your students to use) contact your librarian.  Not sure who your subject area librarian is?  Here’s a handy list for you:

  • Ask A Librarian (scroll to the bottom of the page for a list of all the subject liaison librarians and contact information.

Of course, you can contact any of the librarians for help – they are amazing!

Then, of course there are all of us in CETL: Instructional Designers, Educational Developers, etc.  We can help you look for OER, think about Open Pedagogy for assignments and activities, and just be a sounding board for your ideas and dreams.  Here is how you can get in touch with us:

And don’t forget our Copyright Advisor, especially when trying to figure out how you can integrate copyright materials into your course packs and D2L courses.

That’s all for today.  If there is anything you would like to me to think about for future emails, questions you have that others also might have, or subjects you would like to know more about, please let me know!!

And have a wonderful summer (I promise…it’s coming.)

Emily

 

 

Posted in Open, open education | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Theory & Philosophy of Open Education, Week 6 Assessment: Applying a Critical Approach

So here we are, in the final week, and final assignment, of my Theory & Philosophy of Open Education course. For this assignment, “drawing on week five and six’s readings, you will produce a list of design principles or key considerations (5-10) that could support an educational institution, organization, or other context adopting Open Educational Practices (OEP) for more equitable approaches to teaching and learning. You might provide these principles or considerations in written format, or in the form of a checklist or a visual.”

Well, I am not good at creating visuals, and I shy away from checklists as they are used too often, in my opinion, to make a good show of an institution having met their strategic “standards” if you will.  So, text it is!  And I warn you, this is a bit of a ramble – it’s just the way my blogging rolls.

My first task is to better understand the assignment instructions.  Design principles is a bit of a nebulous term, so I prefer key considerations, because I think you need to identify your priorities before you start the design.  And I will take this assignment to mean those considerations an institution needs to keep in mind in order to support more equitable approaches to teaching and learning.

Secondly, I need to review the topic for weeks 5 and 6: Critical Perspectives.  In week 5 We reviewed readings from Open at the Margins, edited by Bali, Cronin, Czerniewicz, DeRosa, and Jhangiani, and an article by George Veletsianos, Open educational resources: expanding equity or reflecting and furthering inequities? These readings ask us to consider who is invited into Open Education, who is cited, who is represented, and to understand that some people might prefer not to share their creations openly, and that’s ok.  In week 6 we reviewed Lambert and Czerniewicz’s Approaches to Open Education and Social Justice Research (an editorial for their collection Open Education and Social Justice), and Bali, Cronin, and Jhangiani’s Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective which focuses specifically on the social justice aspect of Open Education.  Social Justice would seem to be firmly embedded in the definition of Open Education, but while OEP can indeed empower learners and liberate them from more traditional educational practices, they can also exclude those learners who do not have adequate technology access or who do not speak English (since the majority of OER are produced in English).  In addition, the very nature of open pedagogy (encouraging learners to engage in OEP) can exclude marginalized learners who may feel reticent to put their voices out there.

Now that I have a better handle on the task at hand, first, let’s start our key considerations with institutions coming to terms with what Open Educational Practices are and placing value on them.  Real value.  That means recognizing not only the importance of OEP, but also how institutions need to support faculty, students and EDI initiatives. My own experience is that institutions talk a lot about how everything they do is “for the students,” and yet students still have to decide between their next meal and purchasing course materials.  And faculty are not supported to support their students (and let’s be clear, this is not just about course materials – students need all kinds of support, but it is often left up to faculty to figure out how students are struggling and how to get them help.)

Following from this recognition and acceptance of value and what that might look like in practical terms, let’s then make OEP (not just Open Educational Resources (OER), but the whole range of OEP!) a part of our strategic priorities at the institution – embed them in every strategic pillar and goal (because it’s not hard to do).  Strategic goals generally revolve around student experience, EDI/Social Justice, collaboration, etc. – all clear attributes of OEP.

But, embedding OEP in an institutional plan also means supporting (yes, back to that support piece ’cause you can’t just visit it once) their adoption, adaption, creation, implementation, etc. across the institution.  Real support.  Meaning supporting departments and programs to review existing courses and curriculum to find where OEP can fit.  Meaning supporting faculty to do the work so it’s not just off the sides of their desks in spare moments.  Meaning supporting resources – people resources – who can work with faculty and departments as part of their main work, again not off the sides of their desk. Meaning supporting students to understand how they can engage with OEP in their classes and beyond.

Faculty need to be encouraged to share and talk to each other, not just within departments, but across the institution.  Community needs to be built so the work becomes collegial and open – not done in isolation which leads to discouragement and giving up.  The more the merrier – diversity of views and ideas is key, and you never know from whom you will learn that one thing that completely changes your perspective or practice.And students need to be informed, but also engaged by everyone doing OEP work at institutions.  They need to not only understand what OER are and how they can support their education (reducing cost, improving availability and access), but also need to understand how OEP can create situations where students become more front and centre in their own learning – how they can contribute to the scholarship of their discipline, build skills and confidence, and engage in collaboration and interdisciplinary work.  And through this all, the institution, faculty, and Open Education resource folks need to be there to support them.

Engaging with students in OEP means supporting their voices and diverse experiences to be heard and included.  At the same time, we need to recognize that much institutional administration is still primarily privileged, white and male, and while privilege makes it easy to encourage students to share diverse experiences, it doesn’t ensure safety in that disclosure.  In addition, how do we encourage the inclusion of diverse voices in OEP (and the institution in general) without making it seem like tokenism or a checklist (Indigenous voice, check.  Accessibility voice, check – see why I don’t like checklists?)  I don’t have an answer for this – I just remember someone once asking why aren’t XXX kind of people applying for jobs in our institutions, as if that is an excuse for not hiring diverse employees (because they aren’t beating down our doors), when we perhaps should wonder why the institutions educating our future employees are not opening more doors to that diversity and then what are we doing as an institution to open doors (as well as actively seek out diversity – especially at leadership levels) as an employer.  I’m likely not saying this well, but when you sit on multiple committees that have a “slot” for an Indigenous person, I think maybe we need to be asking different kinds of questions about how we are really “doing” EDI at our institutions.

Phew, that last paragraph took me out of the main focus of this post, but I think it all relates.  Basically, we can’t assume adopting OEP is going to be the panacea for all our social justice woes.  Engaging in OEP should be a mindful and intentional process and we (institutions, faculty, support folks, etc.) need to find ways of encouraging diverse voices to join in (and asking them how they would like to join), opening our doors to inclusion in meaningful ways, and supporting all who want to join in, while respecting those who may not yet be ready to take that step. 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Open Education News and Stuff – Post 3

Forward now to June 1’s Open Education News and Stuff email – getting closer to caught up!  Funny how we were wishing for summer weather at the beginning of June, and now in mid-October we were just a week ago wishing for fall weather to come.  And here we go:

Good morning, everyone.  I hope you are all well as we head into June, and hopefully some real summer weather (but not TOO hot!!)

Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about purpose especially as it relates to Open Education – what is our purpose in wanting to use OER, open textbooks, open pedagogy.  We have an opportunity right now as the college embarks on creating a new strategic 5-year plan to put Open Ed in the forefront of how we can better support students, diversity, decolonization, and all the other values our college aspires to.  Of course, doing the work is hard and demands time and requires support – doing the work of care and supporting students means the institution needs to better support faculty.  I have no solutions for you here, but some thoughts and resources for you to consider as you continue your own journeys opening up your teaching practice.

First, I wanted to share with you my reflection post on the Open Education Sustainability project which we wrapped up last month: Camosun College Open Sustainability Project: My Final Reflection – eLearning blog at Camosun College (opened.ca)

And here is a piece from Brenna Clarke Grey I was reminded of at a recent workshop, which I feel relates to all the work we do to support students and each other, including the work we do in Open Ed: The people have the power to redeem the work of fools: a toolkit for resistance  

And here are a couple of resources around Ethics and Open Ed.

And finally, here is a recording and resources from a recent BCcampus webinar on Indigenous OERs: Respectfully Uplifting Community Voices (May 24, 2022).

Note that in our engagement around the new Strategic Plan for the college, I personally added Open Education to the strat plan (which I would rather call “finding our purpose as an institution” than a strategic plan) discussion (in as much as sticky notes count) in the contexts of teaching and learning, student advocacy, and EDI/accessibility.  If we have further conversations about the strat plan I hope all of you will add your voices to open education as serving our college in so many important ways.

Finally – looking for some summer learning opportunities?  Check out MyFest hosted by Equity Unbound https://myfest.equityunbound.org/what-is-myfest/

Thanks for listening – and if you have anything to share, or have anything you want to talk about in the world of Open Education, let me know!!

Emily

 

Posted in Open, open education | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Open Education News and Stuff – Post 2

So, last time I posted the Camosun Open Ed News and Stuff email from April 19, 202, and now we move forward two weeks into May.  I am including a mash-up of the two May emails here because the first email had links to registrations for upcoming workshops, which are not relevant now.

Hi everyone!

I am tardy in my self-imposed bi-weekly Open Education News and Stuff email this week.  I am on SD and attending the Otessa  (Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association) conference which is part of Congress.  I’ve been hearing about some amazing projects in Open, many of them related to initiatives and experiences taking place since March 2020 (remember our own faculty stories?)  I will compile some of the resources from this conference for my next email in two weeks.

In the meantime, here are some things for you this week:

Awhile back, BCcampus announced its new adoption finder, which I may have shared with some of you already.  I wanted to bring it up again as it is an amazing spreadsheet resource which tells you what open textbooks other institution in BC are adopting, for which courses, and which courses in other institution are equivalent courses so you can see quickly if there is something that might be relevant to your own course you could look at right away.  Here is the announcement with a link to the spreadsheet in it: Announcing the Adoption Finder – BCcampus

A couple of articles/reports about use of OER at community colleges

I attended an amazing session with Rajiv Jhangiani and Robin DeRosa session some of you might be interested in.   You can (hopefully) watch the recording at “Frameworks for Going Open: Human-Centred Futures for Higher Education“.

And for those of you who were unable to attend my open education workshops this spring (there is one remaining) , here are the links to the slides for those workshops.  Please let me know if you have any questions or what to know more.

A couple of articles/reports about use of OER at community colleges

Finally, I wanted to include an article by Michael Geist about the new Copyright law in Canada and its potential implications The Harm from Budget 2022’s Hidden Copyright Term Extension, Part One: Entry to Public Domain of Canadian Authors Lost for a Generation – Michael Geist

Thanks for listening!  If you have any questions, anything to share, or anything you would like to talk  to me about as you work in the world of Open Education, let me know!
Emily

 

 

Posted in Open, open education | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Open Education News and Stuff

Over the past several months I have been sending out Open Education-related emails to a slowly expanding group of colleagues across my college. Generally, I pick a topic and then every other week I send out the email, keeping it as pithy as possible. Recipients do not have to respond, but every so often I hear from someone about something in the email that struck them as interesting or inspiring.

Anyway, I wanted to begin publishing these emails openly as well, in case others (if anyone out there is listening) might be interested in them. Plus it gives me an easy place to point people if they ask about the emails – I don’t have to dig them out and forward them!

So, I thought I would start with the first one I sent out, but unfortunately that is lost in the depths of my email. So, here is the one I sent out on April 19th. I will dig out the next one for a post next week:

I was talking to a faculty member this morning about OER and Open Education, and as I put together a list of resources for her, I thought I would share them with you as well.  Something to get you thinking about Open Education for your Scheduled Development time 🙂

General/overall information and links to collections, etc.

Repositories

OER “courses”

Open Pedagogy

Posted in Open, open education | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Theory & Philosophy of Open Education, Week 2 Assessment: Defining Open

I started a new program last week, a Diploma in Open Education. And Weeks 1 and 2 of the first course, Theory & Philosophy of Open Education, asks us to consider some of the history and definitions of Open Education, which has realizing that I am thinking about Open Ed in a different way than I have up until now.

This first assignment is about Defining Open. And the instructions state: “Based on your interactions and reflections in the first discussion forum, summarize your own definition of open education. With reference to the readings from weeks one and two, explain why you have come up with the definition you have, any limitations it has, and any aspects of open education that it prioritizes or excludes.”

My first thought is that definitions are tricky and clearly defining Open Education has not stopped organizations from trying to profit from OpenEd, or taking the definitions and vilifying them as not useful for accreditation or giving away intellectual property, or of taking those defined OERs and placing them behind a paywall (thinking of the recent move of Lumen Learning open texts to CourseHero).

My problem right now is that any coherent definition I have been living by recently is breaking up into incoherent chunks. I am questioning everything: open is freely available, creates access to education for all, eliminates exclusivity opening the door to diversity and inclusion. But does it, and can it within our current systems of education, government, and accreditation bodies?

Some questions which have arisen for me the past two weeks:

  • Is Open Education truly open when we still have to pay for credentials? Are our traditional definitions of Open limited to providing education for development (and not accreditation), remembering that many of us work for institutions that need to meet a bottom line in order to get provincial funding, namely through tuition?
  • Why is it when things are created to expand the scope of education (books in the vernacular, coffee houses in England in the 1700s, MOOCs, as described by Tait) someone ultimately decides to close them off? Is it elitism? Commodification? Monetization? Ownership? Oversight by authorities?
  • When anyone is refused access to education, does that mean it can no longer be termed “open” in any sense?  Do we assume that calling something “open” automatically does the work of including all (as Cronin asks)?
  • What is Education? We talk a lot about the open side of it, but what is education?  Can we define Open Education without also (re)defining education, and looking at what education means in our 21st century (and post-COVID) world?  Is the opposite of “open”, “broken” as Rajiv Jhangiani suggests in Open as Default: The Future of Education and Scholarship?
  • We talk about providing knowledge freely through open textbooks, OERs, etc., but what about skills and critical thinking? What do we then bring to the table as instructors when students can find knowledge from so many other sources? 



But before I got too far down the road to pessimism, I was inspired by our class discussions.  One of my course colleagues in her post for Week 1 said “Open education is not a one size fits all solution, but rather a beginning to start to address the inequalities we see in education.” (Anita Farenbruch, class discussion posting). And another colleague said “Open education is a result of consistent self-reflection on the degree to which one’s communicative relationship with the the world around them is equitable, inclusive, and based on lifelong learning with the goal of a diverse, joyous and thriving universe.” (Theresa Southam, class discussion post). Finally, several participants mentioned the aspect of sharing as being front and center in open education: sharing knowledge, experiences, resources. Reading my fellow students hopeful and positive posts has been helping me find my own hopefulness again. Small steps can effect big change – we just need to be patient and persistent!

Maybe at the root of it all, I can take to heart not only the amazing definitions presented by my colleagues in this class, but also the words of Maha Bali that “if you reciprocate and if you maintain relationships and you invest in building them, you’re going to get so much more out of [open education] because people will find you and and get you things you didn’t even know you needed…” And that’s the way we continue to build this amazing community we have around Open Education, no matter what our specific definitions.

So coming back to a sense of the realistic, of the “doable”, and in spite of the gremlins running around in my brain insisting that we need to do more (I definitely feel much more pessimistic at this point in time than most of my fellow participants in this course), I would define Open Education as a beginning towards sharing and giving and reciprocity – we all need to start somewhere, and perhaps over time instead of just a bottom up approach at an institutional level, we can explore a wider top-down support of education that is truly open to all.

Cronin, C. (2020). Open Education: Walking a Critical Path. Open(Ing) Education, (January), 9–25. Retrieved from http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/4345/%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1163/9789004422988_002%0Ahttps://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004422988/BP000010.xml%0Ahttps://brill.com/view/title/56897

Jhangiani, R. (2017) Open as Default: The Future of Education and Scholarship. In Jhangiani, R. and Biswas-Diener, R. (eds) Open: The Philosophies and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science

Tait, A. (2018). Education for development: From distance to open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 101-115. Retrieved from https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/294/313

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Creative Commons Certificate Final Assignment – Part II

Submitted for Final Assignment, Category 2, Option 3

Note that my Category 2 is a “choose your own adventure” – an online, asynchronous, open (and cc-licensed) self-directed workshop, primarily aimed at my institution around created and integrating CC licensed materials into their courses.  I built this workshop in WordPress, integrated various open resources and sharing options, and licensed the workshop under a CC BY-SA license.

And now, to see, and possible complete, my workshop, here is it:  Integrating Creative Commons Material into your Course(s).

Posted in Creative Commons | Tagged | Leave a comment

Creative Commons Certificate Final Assignment Part I: Annotated Bibliography

Submitted for Final Assignment, Category 1, Option 2

The Option I chose for this first Category of the final assignment in my course is to “annotate the Additional Resources sections with either notes on what sources were most helpful or suggestions for additional sources to add.”  I have created this annotation in a Google Sheet.  In this sheet I am to:

    • Highlight or add at least five resources–one for each unit. Describe how/why they are relevant. Note where in the unit your resources build on ideas presented (citing the unit section number and paragraph).
    • Additionally, suggest at least 3 annotations for new resources to add from non-North American sources.  Describe how/why they are relevant. See grading rubric for annotation requirements.

I chose this option as I think it might be useful to others (and useful to me to easily refer back to as I move forward promoting Open at our institution)!

Note that my Category 2 is a “choose your own adventure”, and will be posted on a separate WordPress site.

So, to give you a quick snapshot, I have chosen to highlight the following Additional Resources to annotate in order of Unit number:

  1. Debunking the Tragedy of the Commons by On the Commons.
  2. The Public Domain Manifesto by Communia.
  3. About the Open Publication License by David Wiley.
  4. User Related Drawbacks of Open Content Licensing by Till Kreutzer (section 5.6) in Open Content Licensing: From Theory to Practice, edited by Lucie Guibault and Christina Angelopoulos.
  5. Module 9: Accessibility by Open Washington: Open Educational Resources Network.

And I have chosen the following three non-North American resources to add to the Additional Resources list for Unit 5:

  1. The Open Scotland website
  2. On Education and Democracy: 25 Lessons from the Teaching Profession
  3. Adoption and Impact of OER in the Global South

To access the full annotations for these resources, go to my Annotation Google Sheet.

Stay tuned for my next post which will link you to my Category 2, Choose your own Adventure Option!

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Posted in Creative Commons | Tagged , | Leave a comment